McCullough v. Ward-Hamilton

108 So. 489, 91 Fla. 705
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided April 29, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the orders herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said orders; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said orders of the Circuit Court be, and the same are hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCullough v. Ward-Hamilton, 108 So. 489, 91 Fla. 705 (Fla. 1926).

108 So. 489 (McCullough v. Ward-Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.