McCullough v. State
This text of 720 S.W.2d 93 (McCullough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[94]*94OPINION ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
The State successfully petitioned1 the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. 472 U.S. 1007, 105 S.Ct. 2699, 86 L.Ed.2d 716 (1985).
The Supreme Court, in reversing the judgment of this Court (on the State’s motion for rehearing), held that under the facts of this case, there was no presumption of vindictiveness. Consequently, in this case, the North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), presumption was inappropriate. 475 U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 976, 89 L.Ed.2d 104, at 111 (1986).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
720 S.W.2d 93, 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-v-state-texcrimapp-1986.