McCullough v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McCullough v. State

67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 156, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 20

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 10, 1934

DocketNo. 16550.

StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.W.2d 312 (McCullough v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCullough v. State, 67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 156, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 20 (Tex. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

*157 HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for rape; the punishment being assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts. The only bill of exception brings forward complaint at the refusal of certain special charges. Without knowing what facts were proven on the trial, manifestly this court is in no position to determine whether the special charges were appropriate. The presumption prevails that the trial court acted correctly in refusing them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*157 HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for rape; the punishment being assessed at five years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without a statement of facts. The only bill of exception brings forward complaint at the refusal of certain special charges. Without knowing what facts were proven on the trial, manifestly this court is in no position to determine whether the special charges were appropriate. The presumption prevails that the trial court acted correctly in refusing them.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.W.2d 312, 125 Tex. Crim. 156, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-v-state-texcrimapp-1934.