McCullough v. State

Court of Appeals of Iowa·Decided January 10, 2018·No. 17-0434·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 17-0434 Filed January 10, 2018

DAVID McCULLOUGH, Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Humboldt County, Kurt J. Stoebe,

Judge.

David McCullough appeals the dismissal of his postconviction-relief

application on statute-of-limitations grounds. AFFIRMED.

Charles J. Kenville of Kenville Law Firm, P.C., Fort Dodge, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee State.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Doyle and Mullins, JJ. 2

MULLINS, Judge.

David McCullough appeals the dismissal of his postconviction-relief

application on statute-of-limitations grounds. He requests that we apply the

doctrine of equitable tolling to exempt him from the three-year statutory time bar

contained in Iowa Code section 822.3 (2016). Bypassing the State’s error-

preservation concerns, we repeat our position that the doctrine of equitable

tolling does not apply to section 822.3. See, e.g., Long v. State, No. 16-1220,

2017 WL 2684345, at *2 (Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017); Harrington v. State, No.

16-0953, 2017 WL 2684340, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. June 21, 2017); James v.

State, 858 N.W.2d 32, 33 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014).

We affirm the ruling of the district court without further opinion pursuant to

Iowa Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), and (e).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCullough v. State, (iowactapp 2018).

McCullough v. State (McCullough v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shawn James, Applicant-Appellant v. State of Iowa
858 N.W.2d 32 (Court of Appeals of Iowa, 2014)