McCullough v. Lessenberry

769 S.W.2d 420, 27 Ark. App. 127, 1989 Ark. App. LEXIS 144
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided March 29, 1989·No. CA 89-51·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case is an appeal from an order finding the appellant, an Arkansas attorney, in contempt of court while serving as an attorney in an otherwise unrelated case. The appellant filed this motion to transfer the case to the Arkansas Supreme Court, asserting that jurisdiction is properly in the Supreme Court under Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule 29(l)(h) because the case involves the discipline of an attorney-at-law. We agree. The Arkansas Supreme Court stated, in Rosenzweig v. Lofton, 295 Ark. 573, 751 S.W.2d 573 (1988), that contempt cases involving attorneys are matters within their jurisdiction under Rule 29(1)(h).

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCullough v. Lessenberry, 769 S.W.2d 420, 27 Ark. App. 127, 1989 Ark. App. LEXIS 144 (Ark. Ct. App. 1989).

769 S.W.2d 420 (McCullough v. Lessenberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. Allen
751 S.W.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Rosenzweig v. Lofton
751 S.W.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)