McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.
143 F.2d 595, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3140
This text of 143 F.2d 595 (McCullough v. Kammerer Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCullough v. Kammerer Corp., 143 F.2d 595, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3140 (9th Cir. 1944).
Opinion
In his petition for rehearing appellant has cited Kellogg No. 657,777, Hill No. 1,338,773, and Segelhorst No. 1,599,067 and No. 1,767,018 as being demonstrative of anticipation of Reilly-Stone No. 1,625,391. We do not find in these patents such anticipation.
The petition for rehearing is denied.
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
143 F.2d 595, 61 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 544, 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 3140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-v-kammerer-corp-ca9-1944.