McCullough v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.
23 S.E. 838, 97 Ga. 373
This text of 23 S.E. 838 (McCullough v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
McCullough v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co., 23 S.E. 838, 97 Ga. 373 (Ga. 1895).
Opinions
This being an action for the recovery of land, and the evidence being such as to warrant the trial judge in entertaining the opinion that the jury ought to have found that the plaintiff’s right of action was barred by prescription, there was no error in granting a new trial on this ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
City of Atlanta v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.
98 S.E. 83 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1919)
Brown v. Caraker
94 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
McCullough v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co.
32 S.E. 97 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 S.E. 838, 97 Ga. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-v-east-tenn-va-ga-railway-co-ga-1895.