McCullough v. Division of Employment Security

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCullough v. Division of Employment Security

399 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 2395969, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 684

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. WD 75180·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Clinton McCullough appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. On appeal, Mr. McCullough claims that the Commission’s finding of misconduct was not supported by competent evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Clinton McCullough appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying his claim for unemployment benefits because he was discharged for misconduct connected with work. On appeal, Mr. McCullough claims that the Commission’s finding of misconduct was not supported by competent evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The decision of the Commission is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

McCullough v. Division of Employment Security, 399 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 2395969, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 684 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

399 S.W.3d 927 (McCullough v. Division of Employment Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.