McCullough v. Auditore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCullough v. Auditore

219 A.D. 831

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCullough v. Auditore. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D. 510 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1927·Published

Opinion

Order denying motion for order purging appellant of contempt affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The examination of appellant before trial, finally obtained after he had apparently exhausted every method to avoid it, legal and illegal, shows a continued contempt of the court and of the law of the land. We agree with the learned justice at Special Term that “ The course of conduct of the witness here tends to bring the administration cf justice into disrepute.” Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying motion for order purging appellant of contempt affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The examination of appellant before trial, finally obtained after he had apparently exhausted every method to avoid it, legal and illegal, shows a continued contempt of the court and of the law of the land. We agree with the learned justice at Special Term that “ The course of conduct of the witness here tends to bring the administration cf justice into disrepute.” Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Lazansky and Hagarty, JJ., concur.

McCullough v. Auditore, 219 A.D. 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

219 A.D. 831 (McCullough v. Auditore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.