McCullough, Joshua Steven
This text of McCullough, Joshua Steven (McCullough, Joshua Steven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,895-01 & WR-88,895-02
EX PARTE JOSHUA STEVEN MCCULLOUGH, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 2014F00069 & 2014F00070 IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CASS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of failure to
comply with registration requirements and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal
his convictions.
Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because his counsel did not explain the
consequences of the plea to him. He alleges that counsel did not meet with him in person, only
speaking with him in a single two-minute phone call. He alleges that counsel did not explain the
plea in absentia paperwork and waivers to him, that he did not explain the range of punishment for 2
the offense, and was not present when he signed the plea in absentia. Applicant has alleged facts
that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we
held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the
appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX . CODE
CRIM . PROC . art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal
recollection. Id.
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s
claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was
present for his guilty plea hearing or whether the plea in absentia paperwork was utilized to obtain
his guilty plea. The trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel explained the plea
paperwork and consequences of the plea to Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other
findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of
Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 3
Filed: September 19, 2018 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCullough, Joshua Steven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullough-joshua-steven-texcrimapp-2018.