McCullough-Dalzell Crucible Co. v. Philadelphia Co.
72 A. 633, 223 Pa. 336, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 4, 1909·No. Appeal, No. 160·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
The decree is affirmed at the cost of the appellant on the findings and opinion of Judge Miller, specially presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCullough-Dalzell Crucible Co. v. Philadelphia Co., 72 A. 633, 223 Pa. 336, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 537 (Pa. 1909).
72 A. 633 (McCullough-Dalzell Crucible Co. v. Philadelphia Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Faught v. Platte Valley Public Power & Irrigation District
51 N.W.2d 253 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1952)
Dover Copper Mining Co. v. Doenges
12 P.2d 288 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1932)
Hess v. Iowa Light, Heat & Power Co.
221 N.W. 194 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1928)
Bastian v. Marienville Glass Co.
126 A. 798 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Eastern Flavors Co. v. Sprenger Co.
3 Pa. D. & C. 359 (Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas, 1922)
Nolle v. Mutual Union Brewing Co.
108 A. 23 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Southern Pacific Co. v. Spring Valley Water Co.
159 P. 865 (California Supreme Court, 1916)
Turtle Creek Borough v. Penna. Water Co.
90 A. 199 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Commonwealth v. Central District Telephone Co.
90 A. 338 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1914)
Rudy v. Franklinville Ice & Storage Co.
48 Pa. Super. 487 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1912)