McCullock v. Scharr
This text of McCullock v. Scharr (McCullock v. Scharr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT McCULLOCK, Case No.: 19-cv-2110-DMS (DEB)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER PROVIDING NOTICE 13 vs. TO PRO SE PRISONER OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING 14 N. SCHARR, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Defendants. PURSUANT TO KLINGELE / RAND 16
17 18 This notice is required to be given to Plaintiff pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 19 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc) and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988):1 20 Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, Dkt. No. 35, requesting a 21 judgment in their favor. A Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal 22 Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case. 23 Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a Motion for Summary 24 Judgment. Generally, summary judgment will be granted when there is no genuine dispute 25
26 27 1 Klingele and Rand together require the district court “as a bare minimum,” to ensure that a pro se prisoner has “fair notice of the requirements of the summary judgment rule.” 28 1 to any material fact—that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect 2 ||the result of your case, and the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to 3 judgment as a matter of law. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary 4 ||judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot 5 ||simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in 6 declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as 7 || provided by Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendants’ declarations and 8 ||documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not 9 ||submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be 10 ||entered against you. If summary judgment is entered against you, your case will be 11 || dismissed and there will be no trial. 12 Conclusion and Order Setting Briefing Schedule 13 The Court orders that: 14 1. Plaintiff may file an Opposition or a Notice of Non-Opposition to Defendants’ 15 Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 35) with the Court and must serve it on 16 Defendants on or before March 19, 2021. 17 2. If Plaintiff files an Opposition, Defendants may file a Reply and must serve it on 18 Plaintiff on or before April 2, 2021. 19 Following these dates, the Court will, in its discretion, consider Defendants’ Motion 20 ||for Summary Judgment as submitted on the papers, and will issue its written opinion soon 21 ||thereafter. See CivLR 7.1(d)(1). Thus, unless otherwise ordered, no appearances are 22 ||required, and no oral argument will be heard. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: February 16, 2021 Dando oa 6 Honorable Daniel E. Butcher United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 2 □□
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
McCullock v. Scharr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullock-v-scharr-casd-2021.