McCullock v. Gallagher
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 164 (McCullock v. Gallagher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion oe the Court by
After the order dismissing the original case between appellant as plaintiff and Gates as defendant, Gallagher by petition had himself made a party and claimed the horse attached, and the court adjudged it to him without any notice or rule being served on either of the original parties.
Under our Civil. Code any one claiming property attached may by petition have himself made a party to the suit and have his rights adjudicated.
[165]*165But when the cause has been dismissed both the plaintiff and defendant are out of court, there is then no. cause pending, and a party would have just as much right to file an original petition and have judgment thereon without service of process, either actual or constructive.
The whole proceeding on Gallagher’s petition was erroneous; the Code does not allow a claimant to thus make himself a party when there is no cause pending in the court.
Wherefore, the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 164, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccullock-v-gallagher-kyctapp-1866.