McCulloch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McCulloch v. State

191 S.W.2d 357, 191 S.W. 357, 80 Tex. Crim. 505, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 27, 1916

DocketNo. 4324.

StatusPublished

This text of 191 S.W.2d 357 (McCulloch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCulloch v. State, 191 S.W.2d 357, 191 S.W. 357, 80 Tex. Crim. 505, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the pistol law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

This record contains neither a statement of facts, bill of exceptions, motion for new trial, nor notice of appeal, and the attempted recognizance seems to be an appeal bond. Without notice of appeal, even if this bond should he counted sufficient to operate as a recognizance, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach. For these reasons the appeal, therefore, must be dismissed; hut even had the jurisdiction of this court attached, the record as presented would require an affirmance.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the pistol law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

This record contains neither a statement of facts, bill of exceptions, motion for new trial, nor notice of appeal, and the attempted recognizance seems to be an appeal bond. Without notice of appeal, even if this bond should he counted sufficient to operate as a recognizance, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach. For these reasons the appeal, therefore, must be dismissed; hut even had the jurisdiction of this court attached, the record as presented would require an affirmance.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 S.W.2d 357, 191 S.W. 357, 80 Tex. Crim. 505, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcculloch-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.