McCulloch v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

McCulloch v. State

191 S.W.2d 357, 191 S.W. 357, 80 Tex. Crim. 505, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided December 27, 1916·No. No. 4324.·Published

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the pistol law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

This record contains neither a statement of facts, bill of exceptions, motion for new trial, nor notice of appeal, and the attempted recognizance seems to be an appeal bond. Without notice of appeal, even if this bond should he counted sufficient to operate as a recognizance, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach. For these reasons the appeal, therefore, must be dismissed; hut even had the jurisdiction of this court attached, the record as presented would require an affirmance.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the pistol law, his punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

This record contains neither a statement of facts, bill of exceptions, motion for new trial, nor notice of appeal, and the attempted recognizance seems to be an appeal bond. Without notice of appeal, even if this bond should he counted sufficient to operate as a recognizance, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach. For these reasons the appeal, therefore, must be dismissed; hut even had the jurisdiction of this court attached, the record as presented would require an affirmance.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed.

Dismissed.

McCulloch v. State, 191 S.W.2d 357, 191 S.W. 357, 80 Tex. Crim. 505, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 391 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

191 S.W.2d 357 (McCulloch v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.