Home/Supreme Court/McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.

379 U.S. 133
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 7, 1964·No. 472·Published

Opinion

379 U.S. 133 (1964)

McCULLOCH
v.
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD.

No. 472.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 23, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Walter L. Nossaman for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd., 379 U.S. 133 (1964).

379 U.S. 133 (McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board
379 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 1964)