Home/Supreme Court/McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.

379 U.S. 133
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 7, 1964
Docket472
StatusPublished

This text of 379 U.S. 133 (McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Bd., 379 U.S. 133 (1964).

Opinion

379 U.S. 133 (1964)

McCULLOCH
v.
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD.

No. 472.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 23, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

Walter L. Nossaman for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Dan Kaufmann, Assistant Attorney General, and Ernest P. Goodman and Harry W. Low, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCulloch v. California Franchise Tax Board
379 U.S. 133 (Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcculloch-v-california-franchise-tax-bd-scotus-1964.