McCue v. National Bank of Commerce

Supreme Court of Kansas

McCue v. National Bank of Commerce

73 P. 1132, 67 Kan. 843, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 368

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 10, 1903

DocketNo. 13,244

StatusPublished

This text of 73 P. 1132 (McCue v. National Bank of Commerce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCue v. National Bank of Commerce, 73 P. 1132, 67 Kan. 843, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 368 (kan 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Charles O. McCue purchased a herd of 100 cattle from the Zeb. Crider Commission Company. The promissory note of himself and C. W. Fairchild for $2341.72, and his individual promissory note for $328.40, both secured by chattel mortgage upon the cattle, were executed to the commission company as evidence of the entire purchase-money agreed to be paid for the cattle. These promissory notes were sold and delivered to the National Bank of Commerce, of Kansas City, Missouri. After [844]*844default made in payment of the notes, this action in replevin was brought by the bank against McOue and one Lena J, Grace, to secure possession of the cattle. There was a trial to the court without a jury, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

There is a contention made that the bank had not complied with the incorporation laws of this state, and that defendant Lena J. Grace claimed some interest in the cattle. An examination of the record shows that the claims of error made are not well founded.

' The judgment is supported by the facts as found from the evidence,-is unquestionably right, and must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Charles O. McCue purchased a herd of 100 cattle from the Zeb. Crider Commission Company. The promissory note of himself and C. W. Fairchild for $2341.72, and his individual promissory note for $328.40, both secured by chattel mortgage upon the cattle, were executed to the commission company as evidence of the entire purchase-money agreed to be paid for the cattle. These promissory notes were sold and delivered to the National Bank of Commerce, of Kansas City, Missouri. After [844]*844default made in payment of the notes, this action in replevin was brought by the bank against McOue and one Lena J, Grace, to secure possession of the cattle. There was a trial to the court without a jury, which resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants bring error.

There is a contention made that the bank had not complied with the incorporation laws of this state, and that defendant Lena J. Grace claimed some interest in the cattle. An examination of the record shows that the claims of error made are not well founded.

' The judgment is supported by the facts as found from the evidence,-is unquestionably right, and must be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 P. 1132, 67 Kan. 843, 1903 Kan. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccue-v-national-bank-of-commerce-kan-1903.