McCrosson v. Civil Service Commission

174 A. 548, 113 N.J.L. 406, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 381

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 27, 1934·Published

Opinion

This case presents much the same kind of a record as that disclosed in Naples v. Civil Service Commission of NewJersey, 113 N.J.L. 426, and for the reasons expressed in theper curiam opinion filed in that case the judgment is affirmed.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

McCrosson v. Civil Service Commission, 174 A. 548, 113 N.J.L. 406, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 381 (N.J. 1934).

Pincite

174 A. 548 (McCrosson v. Civil Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Naples v. Civil Service Commission

174 A. 547 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)

Opinion

Related