McCroskey v. State

634 S.E.2d 824, 280 Ga. App. 638
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 2006
DocketA06A0912, A06A0922, A06A1130
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 634 S.E.2d 824 (McCroskey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCroskey v. State, 634 S.E.2d 824, 280 Ga. App. 638 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Phipps, Judge.

With the assistance of counsel, Jerry Michael McCroskey entered nonnegotiated guilty pleas to criminal charges contained in three separate indictments. After being sentenced, McCroskey discharged his attorney and moved to withdraw his guilty pleas based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Among other things, McCroskey claims that counsel erroneously advised him that he could withdraw his guilty pleas as a matter of right even after pronouncement of sentence. Without addressing that claim, the trial court denied McCroskey’s motions to withdraw. McCroskey appeals. We vacate the order appealed and remand for consideration of the unaddressed claim. •

McCroskey was indicted in the Superior Court of Rabun County on one count of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. He was later indicted in the Superior Court of Stephens County on three counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and one count each of possession of a firearm during commission of a felony, sale of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. And shortly thereafter, a felony accusation was preferred in the Superior Court of Stephens County charging McCroskey with one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

About two weeks after the Stephens County charges were brought, McCroskey filed petitions to enter Alford guilty pleas in all cases. A hearing on entry of the guilty pleas was held in the Superior Court of Stephens County in all three cases. 1 At the hearing, McCroskey entered nonnegotiated guilty pleas in all three cases, and the court deferred sentencing. At the sentencing hearing, the court sentenced McCroskey on all the counts to which he had pled guilty to a total of 35 years with the first 30 years to be served in confinement and the remainder to be served on probation.

After pronouncement of sentence, defense counsel informed the court that McCroskey had just told him that he wanted to withdraw his guilty pleas and had then discharged him because he refused to do so as he did not find that to be in.McCroskey’s best interests. The court concluded the hearing by finding that McCroskey’s guilty pleas had *639 been freely and voluntarily entered with the advice of counsel and announcing that McCroskey would not be allowed to withdraw the pleas.

Through another attorney, McCroskey then filed written motions to withdraw his guilty pleas or for reconsideration of the sentences in all three cases. In the motions, McCroskey charged his defense attorney with ineffective assistance in failing to properly inform him of the ramifications of his nonnegotiated guilty pleas, the possible sentences, the meaning of an Alford plea, and his ability to withdraw his plea after pronouncement of sentence. McCroskey also alleged that counsel was impaired by the use of prescription pain medication at the time of sentencing. Following a hearing, the court entered an order denying McCroskey’s motions on grounds that his guilty pleas had been freely, voluntarily, and knowingly entered and that counsel’s use of prescription pain medication at the time of the sentencing hearing had not impaired his performance so as to have rendered him constitutionally ineffective.

In Case No. A06A0912, McCroskey appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea in the multi-count Stephens County case. In Case No. A06A0922, he appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea in the single-count Stephens County case. In Case No. A06A1130, he appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea in the Rabun County case.

1. McCroskey first contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to inform him that he could not withdraw his nonnegotiated guilty pleas after the court had orally pronounced sentence.

“After sentence is pronounced, withdrawal of a guilty plea is allowed only to correct a manifest injustice, and the trial court’s refusal to allow withdrawal will not be disturbed on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” 2 The foregoing principle stems in part from State v. Germany, 3 wherein our Supreme Court, construing OCGA§ 17-7-93 (b), held that a defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after the trial court’s oral announcement of sentence. In Germany, the Court also held, however, that if the trial court intends to reject the plea agreement, the court shall inform the defendant personally that the defendant may withdraw his or her guilty plea as a matter of right. 4 This and other directives set forth in Germany are now found in Uniform Superior Court Rules (USCR) 33.10 and 33.11 (D). Additionally, USCR 33.7 states that, “[i]f *640 the prosecuting attorney has agreed to seek charge or sentence leniency which must be approved by the judge, the judge must advise the defendant personally that the recommendations of the prosecuting attorney are not binding on the judge.” It is, however, axiomatic that a nonnegotiated guilty plea is one in which there is neither a plea agreement nor a recommendation by the state as to charge or sentence leniency. Thus, the above USCR directives are inapplicable here.

Bice v. State, 5 by contrast, is similar to this case in that there, as here, a defendant who had entered a nonnegotiated guilty plea sought to withdraw it after the pronouncement of sentence. Among other things, he asserted that during a nontranscribed bench conference the trial court had led his attorney to believe that it would allow the defendant to withdraw his guilty plea if he were dissatisfied with the sentence. We found that assertion contradicted by the transcript of the plea hearing, which made clear that “during the plea hearing, the trial judge asked [defendant] if he understood that he was pleading guilty without a recommendation from the State, and even if there were a recommendation from the State, the judge could sentence [defendant] to whatever was authorized by the law.” 6

Here too, the transcript of the plea hearing shows that the trial court explained to McCroskey that his entry of a nonnegotiated guilty plea was without a sentence recommendation by the state and authorized the court to impose sentences within the range of “five to forty to li[f]e, because of your history.” And at the hearing on McCroskey’s motion to withdraw his pleas, his former attorney testified that he had explained the difference between a negotiated and nonnegotiated guilty plea to McCroskey by telling him that “a nonnegotiated plea is one in which the judge has total free reign within the sentencing range.”

Johnson v. State 7

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hills v. State
673 S.E.2d 614 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
McCroskey v. State
660 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
634 S.E.2d 824, 280 Ga. App. 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccroskey-v-state-gactapp-2006.