McCrimmon v. Brundage

53 Fla. 478
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 15, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The plaintiffs declared upon a “contract which was oral, but which the defendants agreed to reduce to writing, and which was reduced to writing,” to which a plea was interposed denying the contract in the language of the declaration. Issue was joined upon this plea, and at the conclusion of the evidence a verdict was directed for the defendant. ■

An oral contract which is agreed to be reduced to writing is not complete until fully executed by delivery. 9 Cyc. 280 and cases cited.

•The evidence was conclusive that there was no delivery of the written contract, and such also is the admission in a replication filed to other pleas. There was, therefore, no error in directing the' verdict, and the judgment thereon is affirmed.

All concur, except Whitfield, J., who dissents. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCrimmon v. Brundage, 53 Fla. 478 (Fla. 1907).

53 Fla. 478 (McCrimmon v. Brundage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Philips v. Gress Mfg. Co.
274 F. 294 (Fifth Circuit, 1921)
Walker Grain Co. v. Denison Mill & Grain Co.
178 S.W. 555 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Ocala Cooperage Co. v. Florida Cooperage Co.
59 Fla. 394 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1910)