McCreery v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

McCreery v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 410, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 272

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedApril 1, 1953

DocketNo. 57242; protest 188943-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Cust. Ct. 410 (McCreery v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCreery v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 410, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 272 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 61 slips and 1 nightgown missing.from case No.. 225. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 61 slips and 1 nightgown missing.from case No.. 225. The protest was sustained to this extent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Cust. Ct. 410, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccreery-v-united-states-cusc-1953.