McCreedy v. 37 West 46th Street Realty Corp.
228 A.D.2d 174, 644 N.Y.2d 3, 644 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6286
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Neither the antisubrogation rule nor the provisions of the lease preclude plaintiff subrogee from recovering for the payment on plaintiff’s claim for water damage to its inventory as a result of defendant’s negligence. Defendant was insured by a different carrier, Allcity Insurance Company, for the risk covered herein and thus, the public policy considerations underlying the antisubrogation rule are inapplicable (Wright v McCann & Son, 216 AD2d 73). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCreedy v. 37 West 46th Street Realty Corp., 228 A.D.2d 174, 644 N.Y.2d 3, 644 N.Y.S.2d 3, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
228 A.D.2d 174 (McCreedy v. 37 West 46th Street Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Phoenix Insurance v. Stamell
21 A.D.3d 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Kazmierczak v. Town of Clarence
292 A.D.2d 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)