Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/McCree v. State

McCree v. State

66 So. 3d 1023, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11081, 2011 WL 2731210
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 15, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-3889
StatusPublished

This text of 66 So. 3d 1023 (McCree v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCree v. State, 66 So. 3d 1023, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11081, 2011 WL 2731210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Brewer v. State, 413 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (a trial court must not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless there is no legally sufficient evidence on which the trier of fact may base a verdict of guilt), review denied, 426 So.2d 25 (Fla.1983); see also Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981) (where a verdict depends upon a determination of the credibility of witnesses, an appellate court will ordinarily not disturb it), affirmed, 457 U.S. 31, 102 S.Ct. 2211, 72 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982).

MONACO, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tibbs v. Florida
457 U.S. 31 (Supreme Court, 1982)
Brewer v. State
413 So. 2d 1217 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 So. 3d 1023, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11081, 2011 WL 2731210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccree-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.