McCreary v. Metropolitan Dade County

144 So. 2d 337
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 18, 1962·No. No. 62-6·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BARKDULL, Judge.

The appellants, as petitioners in the trial court, sought a “writ of certiorari and other relief” to review a certain rezoning resolution adopted by Dade County upon application of the appellee, Howard Scharlin. The petition was not accompanied by a record of the proceedings which resulted in the adoption of the resolution, in accordance with Florida Appellate Rule 4.5(c), 31 F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge correctly entered a final order dismissing the petition for certiorari. See: Ex parte Jones, 92 Fla. 1015, 110 So. 532; Connolly v. Connolly, Fla. 1956, 86 So.2d 167; 5 Fla.Jur., Cer-tiorari, § 22.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCreary v. Metropolitan Dade County, 144 So. 2d 337 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

144 So. 2d 337 (McCreary v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sunset Islands 3 & 4 Ass'n v. City of Miami Beach
214 So. 2d 45 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Edelstein v. Dade County
171 So. 2d 611 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)