McCreary v. Metropolitan Dade County
This text of 144 So. 2d 337 (McCreary v. Metropolitan Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellants, as petitioners in the trial court, sought a “writ of certiorari and other relief” to review a certain rezoning resolution adopted by Dade County upon application of the appellee, Howard Scharlin. The petition was not accompanied by a record of the proceedings which resulted in the adoption of the resolution, in accordance with Florida Appellate Rule 4.5(c), 31 F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge correctly entered a final order dismissing the petition for certiorari. See: Ex parte Jones, 92 Fla. 1015, 110 So. 532; Connolly v. Connolly, Fla. 1956, 86 So.2d 167; 5 Fla.Jur., Cer-tiorari, § 22.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 So. 2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccreary-v-metropolitan-dade-county-fladistctapp-1962.