McCready v. Zablotny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCready v. Zablotny

262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D. 951 (McCready v. Zablotny) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCready v. Zablotny, 262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2700 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff, in an action for damages, for death of plaintiff’s intestate arising out of the negligent operation of an automobile. The order denies defendants’ motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $2700 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment is for plaintiff, in an action for damages, for death of plaintiff’s intestate arising out of the negligent operation of an automobile. The order denies defendants’ motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

262 A.D. 951, 29 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccready-v-zablotny-nyappdiv-1941.