McCrea v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

McCrea v. State

210 So. 2d 724, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5591

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 1968·No. No. 67-757·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The principal point on this appeal is that the trial judge committed error during the progress of the trial by making comments, in the presence of the jury, in regard to one of the co-defendants. No objection to the remarks of the trial judge, nor motion to strike same from the record, motion for mistrial or motion for instruction to the jury to disregard the remarks were made in the trial court.

Therefore, we find these remarks not subject for review in this forum. See: Surrency v. State, 48 Fla. 59, 37 So. 575; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791; Hysler v. State, 85 Fla. 153, 95 So. 573.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The principal point on this appeal is that the trial judge committed error during the progress of the trial by making comments, in the presence of the jury, in regard to one of the co-defendants. No objection to the remarks of the trial judge, nor motion to strike same from the record, motion for mistrial or motion for instruction to the jury to disregard the remarks were made in the trial court.

Therefore, we find these remarks not subject for review in this forum. See: Surrency v. State, 48 Fla. 59, 37 So. 575; Maloy v. State, 52 Fla. 101, 41 So. 791; Hysler v. State, 85 Fla. 153, 95 So. 573.

Affirmed.

McCrea v. State, 210 So. 2d 724, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

210 So. 2d 724 (McCrea v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related