McCrea v. McCrea

58 How. Pr. 220
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1879·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Barker, J.

The motion is denied, without costs. It is held that the only power possessed by the court to strike out a pleading, or to change and alter the same in any particular, on a motion like this, is contained in sections 538, 545 and 546 of the Code. It is not pretended hy the counsel for the plaintiff that he has made a case within either section.

In a proceeding to adjudge the defendant guilty of a contempt, it may he the court can, as a means of punishment, strike out his answer. On that point, I do «not now express my opinion.

So long as there is an issue framed hy the pleadings, in an action for divorce, there can be no reference (2 R. S., p. 145, sec. 40, marginal; Code, 968; Batzel agt. Batzel, 54 How. Pr., 139).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCrea v. McCrea, 58 How. Pr. 220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

58 How. Pr. 220 (McCrea v. McCrea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bachelor v. Bachelor
71 P. 193 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Zimmerman v. Zimmerman
7 Mont. 114 (Montana Supreme Court, 1887)