McCrea v. McCrea
This text of 58 How. Pr. 220 (McCrea v. McCrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion is denied, without costs. It is held that the only power possessed by the court to strike out a pleading, or to change and alter the same in any particular, on a motion like this, is contained in sections 538, 545 and 546 of the Code. It is not pretended hy the counsel for the plaintiff that he has made a case within either section.
In a proceeding to adjudge the defendant guilty of a contempt, it may he the court can, as a means of punishment, strike out his answer. On that point, I do «not now express my opinion.
So long as there is an issue framed hy the pleadings, in an action for divorce, there can be no reference (2 R. S., p. 145, sec. 40, marginal; Code, 968; Batzel agt. Batzel, 54 How. Pr., 139).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 How. Pr. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrea-v-mccrea-nysupct-1879.