McCrea v. McCrea

58 How. Pr. 220
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 How. Pr. 220 (McCrea v. McCrea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCrea v. McCrea, 58 How. Pr. 220 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Barker, J.

The motion is denied, without costs. It is held that the only power possessed by the court to strike out a pleading, or to change and alter the same in any particular, on a motion like this, is contained in sections 538, 545 and 546 of the Code. It is not pretended hy the counsel for the plaintiff that he has made a case within either section.

In a proceeding to adjudge the defendant guilty of a contempt, it may he the court can, as a means of punishment, strike out his answer. On that point, I do «not now express my opinion.

So long as there is an issue framed hy the pleadings, in an action for divorce, there can be no reference (2 R. S., p. 145, sec. 40, marginal; Code, 968; Batzel agt. Batzel, 54 How. Pr., 139).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bachelor v. Bachelor
71 P. 193 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Zimmerman v. Zimmerman
7 Mont. 114 (Montana Supreme Court, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 How. Pr. 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrea-v-mccrea-nysupct-1879.