McCray v. State

247 So. 3d 721

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*722AFFIRMED . See Romero v. State , 105 So.3d 550, 552-54 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (holding that Graham v. Florida , 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), does not apply to an 18-year-old defendant, notwithstanding the juvenile nature of the defendant's mental and emotional development), rev. denied , 131 So.3d 789 (Fla. 2013).

Wetherell, Rowe, and Winokur, JJ., concur.