McCray v. State

941 So. 2d 1262, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19583, 2006 WL 3371562
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 919 So. 2d 647
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 2006·No. No. 2D06-3603·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary denial of Todd McCray’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellee has conceded that the postconviction court erred in its application of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (2005), because McCray’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is a collateral criminal proceeding which, pursuant to section 57.085(10), is exempt from section 57.085. In his motion, McCray was not seeking deferral of prepayment of court costs and fees pursuant to section 57.085. Accordingly, we reverse the postconviction court’s denial and remand for the postconviction court to reconsider McCray’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis under section 57.081, Florida Statutes (2005).

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCray v. State, 941 So. 2d 1262, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19583, 2006 WL 3371562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 1262 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.