McCray v. State
425 So. 2d 1, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2278
Opinions
By petition for review we have before us a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal, McCray v. State, 397 So.2d 1229 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), which allegedly conflicts with the decisions of this Court in Mahaun v. State, 377 So.2d 1158 (Fla.1979), and Redondo v. State, 403 So.2d 954 (Fla.1981). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
The question presented in this case is the same as that presented in Pitts v. State, 425 So.2d 542 (Fla.1983). Based on Pitts, we approve the decision of the district court in this case.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCray v. State, 425 So. 2d 1, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2278 (Fla. 1983).
425 So. 2d 1 (McCray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nacher v. State
465 So. 2d 598 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Davis v. State
459 So. 2d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Gonzalez v. State
440 So. 2d 514 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Ayrado v. State
431 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
In Re the Florida Bar
425 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)