McCray v. Littlejohn

478 F. App'x 754
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 6, 2012
DocketNo. 12-6331
StatusPublished

This text of 478 F. App'x 754 (McCray v. Littlejohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCray v. Littlejohn, 478 F. App'x 754 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ron Santa McCray appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Littlejohn, No. 2:11-cv-02558-TLW, 2012 WL 220225 (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
478 F. App'x 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccray-v-littlejohn-ca4-2012.