McCray v. Johnson

Fourth Circuit

McCray v. Johnson

66 F. App'x 508

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2003·No. No. 03-6314·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ray Thomas McCray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice because he failed to pay the filing fee. Because McCray can refile his petition and pay the requisite filing fee, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Ray Thomas McCray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition without prejudice because he failed to pay the filing fee. Because McCray can refile his petition and pay the requisite filing fee, his appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

McCray v. Johnson, 66 F. App'x 508 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

66 F. App'x 508 (McCray v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related