McCray v. Bennett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2007·No. 06-2155·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2155

MILTON MCCRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK; MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02182-JFM)

Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Milton McCray appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Bennett, No. 1:06-

cv-02182-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We deny McCray’s motion to

enforce his rights and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCray v. Bennett, (4th Cir. 2007).

McCray v. Bennett (McCray v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.