McCray v. Bennett
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2155
MILTON MCCRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JUDGE RICHARD BENNETT; SUSQUEHANNA BANK; MCGUIRE WOODS LLP; GORDON, FEINBLATT, ROTHMAN, HOFFBERGER AND HOLLANDER, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (1:06- cv-02182-JFM)
Submitted: April 26, 2007 Decided: April 30, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Milton McCray appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. McCray v. Bennett, No. 1:06-
cv-02182-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 30, 2006). We deny McCray’s motion to
enforce his rights and dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
McCray v. Bennett (McCray v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.