McCrary v. Western & Atlantic Railroad

134 S.E. 347, 35 Ga. App. 641, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1045
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 20, 1926
Docket17154
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 S.E. 347 (McCrary v. Western & Atlantic Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCrary v. Western & Atlantic Railroad, 134 S.E. 347, 35 Ga. App. 641, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1045 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

Where the plaintiff filed suit against the defendant,

Western and Atlantic Railroad, a separate and distinct corporation from the Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway, for the recovery of a reward offered by the latter corporation, stipulating that “The Nashville, Chattanooga and St. Louis Railway will pay a reward . . for information resulting in the conviction of any one for the crime of wilfully tampering with . . its tracks . . or other portion of its roadway,” there was no error in dismissing the petition upon general demurrer. N., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Edwards, 91 Ga. 24 (16 S. E. 347); Branan v. N., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 119 Ga. 738 (46 S. E. 882) ; Armour Car Lines v. Summerour, 5 Ga. App. 619 (63 S. E. 667) ; Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Peacock, 16 Ga. App. 772 (86 S. E. 389).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCrary v. Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway
141 S.E. 416 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 S.E. 347, 35 Ga. App. 641, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrary-v-western-atlantic-railroad-gactapp-1926.