McCrary v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

McCrary v. State

21 Ind. 268

DecidedNovember 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ind. 268 (McCrary v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCrary v. State, 21 Ind. 268 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit upon a forfeited recognizance. Judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal to this Court.

The record, as first filed, and on which errors were assigned, was defective, and the errors upon that record were well taken.

But a certiorari has been issued and returned, accompanied by a complete record. That record shows that the errors, as[269]*269signed upon the first, do not, in fact, exist; and no further errors have been assigned upon the complete record.

R. L. & T. D. Walpole, for the appellant. Oscar B. Hord, Attorney General, for the appellee.

The judgment below is, therefore, affirmed, with costs, and 1 per cent. damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit upon a forfeited recognizance. Judgment for the plaintiff. Appeal to this Court.

The record, as first filed, and on which errors were assigned, was defective, and the errors upon that record were well taken.

But a certiorari has been issued and returned, accompanied by a complete record. That record shows that the errors, as[269]*269signed upon the first, do not, in fact, exist; and no further errors have been assigned upon the complete record.

R. L. & T. D. Walpole, for the appellant. Oscar B. Hord, Attorney General, for the appellee.

The judgment below is, therefore, affirmed, with costs, and 1 per cent. damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ind. 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrary-v-state-ind-1863.