McCrary v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court

McCrary v. Oklahoma

414 U.S. 966, 94 S. Ct. 275, 38 L. Ed. 2d 212, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1084

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 23, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1648

StatusPublished

This text of 414 U.S. 966 (McCrary v. Oklahoma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCrary v. Oklahoma, 414 U.S. 966, 94 S. Ct. 275, 38 L. Ed. 2d 212, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1084 (1973).

Pincite

Opinions

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ct. Crim. App. Okla. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 U.S. 966, 94 S. Ct. 275, 38 L. Ed. 2d 212, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccrary-v-oklahoma-scotus-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack