McCranie v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

McCranie v. State

195 S.E.2d 757, 128 Ga. App. 64, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1389

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 2, 1973

Docket47770

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.E.2d 757 (McCranie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCranie v. State, 195 S.E.2d 757, 128 Ga. App. 64, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1389 (Ga. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, convicted and sentenced for crimes committed during the burglary of a business, complains of the denial of a motion for continuance which was based upon the ground that a newspaper article concerning a co-defendant’s guilty plea and sentence for the burglary appeared the morning of trial. Apparently it is defendant’s contention that the article prejudiced the jury on the issue of guilt and thereby damaged him. In his unsworn [65]*65statement, defendant, referring to the testimony, admitted his part in the burglary and asked the jury for understanding. Under the circumstances here we find no reversible error in denying the motion for continuance. Cf. Sims v. State, 177 Ga. 266, 268 (170 SE 58).

Submitted January 11, 1973 —Decided February 2, 1973. Herndon & Hubble, Robert E. Herndon, for appellant. Stephen Pace, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Eberhardt, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, convicted and sentenced for crimes committed during the burglary of a business, complains of the denial of a motion for continuance which was based upon the ground that a newspaper article concerning a co-defendant’s guilty plea and sentence for the burglary appeared the morning of trial. Apparently it is defendant’s contention that the article prejudiced the jury on the issue of guilt and thereby damaged him. In his unsworn [65]*65statement, defendant, referring to the testimony, admitted his part in the burglary and asked the jury for understanding. Under the circumstances here we find no reversible error in denying the motion for continuance. Cf. Sims v. State, 177 Ga. 266, 268 (170 SE 58).

Submitted January 11, 1973 —Decided February 2, 1973. Herndon & Hubble, Robert E. Herndon, for appellant. Stephen Pace, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pannell and Stolz, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.E.2d 757, 128 Ga. App. 64, 1973 Ga. App. LEXIS 1389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccranie-v-state-gactapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack