McCranie ex rel. McCranie v. Crowder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

McCranie ex rel. McCranie v. Crowder

125 S.E.2d 32, 256 N.C. 735, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 541

DecidedApril 18, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E.2d 32 (McCranie ex rel. McCranie v. Crowder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCranie ex rel. McCranie v. Crowder, 125 S.E.2d 32, 256 N.C. 735, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 541 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the parties was sharply conflicting. Each party claimed to have observed the rules of the road. Each claimed the other violated them. The jury resolved the conflict by ac[736]*736cepting the plaintiff’s version and found the defendant’s negligence caused the accident. The record does not disclose any reason sufficient in law to disturb the result of the trial.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence of the parties was sharply conflicting. Each party claimed to have observed the rules of the road. Each claimed the other violated them. The jury resolved the conflict by ac[736]*736cepting the plaintiff’s version and found the defendant’s negligence caused the accident. The record does not disclose any reason sufficient in law to disturb the result of the trial.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 S.E.2d 32, 256 N.C. 735, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccranie-ex-rel-mccranie-v-crowder-nc-1962.