McCracken v. Cones

53 Colo. 321
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 15, 1912·No. No 7502·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gabbert

delivered the opinion of the court;

One claiming under a tax deed yhich is annulled is not entitled to a refund of taxes paid by him on the premises subsequent to the delivery..of the deed unless he gives evidence of the fact, and the amo.unt of the payment.- Eaches v. Johnston, 46 Colo. 457; McKinley-Lanning Co. v. Varney, 19 Colo. App. 210. Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Musser and Mr. Justice Hill concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCracken v. Cones, 53 Colo. 321 (Colo. 1912).

53 Colo. 321 (McCracken v. Cones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brewer v. Folsom Bros. Co.
7 P.2d 224 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1932)
Scott v. Sullivan
244 P. 466 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1926)
Green v. Halsted
238 P. 40 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1925)
Eagan v. Mahoney
24 Colo. App. 285 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1913)