McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance

639 N.E.2d 446, 70 Ohio St. 3d 488

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 1994·No. No. 93-1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 639 N.E.2d 438, decided today.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., concurs separately. Wright, J., dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions in Martin v. Midwestern Group Ins. Co. (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 478, 485-486, 639 N.E.2d 438, 443.

McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance, 639 N.E.2d 446, 70 Ohio St. 3d 488 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

639 N.E.2d 446 (McCoy v. Western Reserve Mutual Lightning Rod Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related