McCoy v. Stokes

11 N.E.3d 314, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1463
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 2014·No. 2014-0501·Published

Opinion

Licking App. No. 13-CA-123. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to supplement, it is ordered by the court that the motion is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Stokes, 11 N.E.3d 314, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1463 (Ohio 2014).

11 N.E.3d 314 (McCoy v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.