McCoy v. Stokes

Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Stokes

453 F. App'x 377

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2011·No. No. 11-6889·Published

Opinion

[378]*378Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Stokes, No. 3:10-cv-00868-JRS, 2011 WL 2580638 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[378]*378Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jo-Allen McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Stokes, No. 3:10-cv-00868-JRS, 2011 WL 2580638 (E.D. Va. June 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

McCoy v. Stokes, 453 F. App'x 377 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

453 F. App'x 377 (McCoy v. Stokes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related