McCoy v. State

79 S.W.2d 320

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in McCoy v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 Tex. Crim. 298 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1935·No. No. 17224·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Appellants were jointly charged with the robbery by assault of W. M. Caraway, which resulted in taking from Caraway the sum of 40 cents.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented.

There is no statement of the evidence heard in the trial court brought forward for review.

Perceiving no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Appellants were jointly charged with the robbery by assault of W. M. Caraway, which resulted in taking from Caraway the sum of 40 cents.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented.

There is no statement of the evidence heard in the trial court brought forward for review.

Perceiving no error, the judgment is affirmed.

McCoy v. State, 79 S.W.2d 320 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

79 S.W.2d 320 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.