McCoy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCoy v. State

388 S.W.3d 177, 2012 WL 943227, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 368

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 2012·No. No. ED 96883·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Avery McCoy appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Avery McCoy appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 amended motion for post-conviction relief, without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

McCoy v. State, 388 S.W.3d 177, 2012 WL 943227, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 368 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 177 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.