McCoy v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

McCoy v. State

895 S.W.2d 639, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 1995 WL 128505

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 1995·No. No. 66653·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the ruling of the trial court was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the ruling of the trial court was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties with a brief memorandum explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

McCoy v. State, 895 S.W.2d 639, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 1995 WL 128505 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 639 (McCoy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.