McCoy v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCoy v. State Liquor Authority

47 A.D.2d 670, 364 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8881

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1975·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

1Proceeding ‘ under CPLR article TS^to 'annul a deter'-npnation of-respondent State Liquof Authority, dated. October" 15,1974, Vrhich suspended,- petitioner’s. • restaurant 'liquor .-license fan. 10. days "and demanded. ' payrfient of . petitioner’s $1,000 bond, on the ground-that petitioner .had suffered or permitted gambling on the licensed premises, in viplation t>£ subdivision .6 of section 10.6. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. " D'etermififition modified, on the law, -by striking therefrom the: demand "for payment-of- the bond. As so .modified,- determination .confirmed, without costs.' In ppr opinion'the provision-for payment of the bond "as/op additional penalty -was excessive and ' therefore; an abuse of-.discretion.; Under all of,tbe circumstances; tke penalty should have been limited to" a suspension of -the- license fór a périód of-lOLdaysv Latham, Actmg P. J,,";CphaIan'anS Brennan, JJ. concur; Christ end Munder, Jj„, dissent.and voté tó dismiss the proceedings on the Merits and to confirm the determination,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1Proceeding ‘ under CPLR article TS^to 'annul a deter'-npnation of-respondent State Liquof Authority, dated. October" 15,1974, Vrhich suspended,- petitioner’s. • restaurant 'liquor .-license fan. 10. days "and demanded. ' payrfient of . petitioner’s $1,000 bond, on the ground-that petitioner .had suffered or permitted gambling on the licensed premises, in viplation t>£ subdivision .6 of section 10.6. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. " D'etermififition modified, on the law, -by striking therefrom the: demand "for payment-of- the bond. As so .modified,- determination .confirmed, without costs.' In ppr opinion'the provision-for payment of the bond "as/op additional penalty -was excessive and ' therefore; an abuse of-.discretion.; Under all of,tbe circumstances; tke penalty should have been limited to" a suspension of -the- license fór a périód of-lOLdaysv Latham, Actmg P. J,,";CphaIan'anS Brennan, JJ. concur; Christ end Munder, Jj„, dissent.and voté tó dismiss the proceedings on the Merits and to confirm the determination,

McCoy v. State Liquor Authority, 47 A.D.2d 670, 364 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

47 A.D.2d 670 (McCoy v. State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related