McCoy v. State Liquor Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

McCoy v. State Liquor Authority

47 A.D.2d 670, 364 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 670 (McCoy v. State Liquor Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCoy v. State Liquor Authority, 47 A.D.2d 670, 364 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

1Proceeding ‘ under CPLR article TS^to 'annul a deter'-npnation of-respondent State Liquof Authority, dated. October" 15,1974, Vrhich suspended,- petitioner’s. • restaurant 'liquor .-license fan. 10. days "and demanded. ' payrfient of . petitioner’s $1,000 bond, on the ground-that petitioner .had suffered or permitted gambling on the licensed premises, in viplation t>£ subdivision .6 of section 10.6. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. " D'etermififition modified, on the law, -by striking therefrom the: demand "for payment-of- the bond. As so .modified,- determination .confirmed, without costs.' In ppr opinion'the provision-for payment of the bond "as/op additional penalty -was excessive and ' therefore; an abuse of-.discretion.; Under all of,tbe circumstances; tke penalty should have been limited to" a suspension of -the- license fór a périód of-lOLdaysv Latham, Actmg P. J,,";CphaIan'anS Brennan, JJ. concur; Christ end Munder, Jj„, dissent.and voté tó dismiss the proceedings on the Merits and to confirm the determination,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1Proceeding ‘ under CPLR article TS^to 'annul a deter'-npnation of-respondent State Liquof Authority, dated. October" 15,1974, Vrhich suspended,- petitioner’s. • restaurant 'liquor .-license fan. 10. days "and demanded. ' payrfient of . petitioner’s $1,000 bond, on the ground-that petitioner .had suffered or permitted gambling on the licensed premises, in viplation t>£ subdivision .6 of section 10.6. of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. " D'etermififition modified, on the law, -by striking therefrom the: demand "for payment-of- the bond. As so .modified,- determination .confirmed, without costs.' In ppr opinion'the provision-for payment of the bond "as/op additional penalty -was excessive and ' therefore; an abuse of-.discretion.; Under all of,tbe circumstances; tke penalty should have been limited to" a suspension of -the- license fór a périód of-lOLdaysv Latham, Actmg P. J,,";CphaIan'anS Brennan, JJ. concur; Christ end Munder, Jj„, dissent.and voté tó dismiss the proceedings on the Merits and to confirm the determination,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 670, 364 N.Y.S.2d 209, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-state-liquor-authority-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack