McCoy v. State

458 So. 2d 1193, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16565
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 1984
DocketNo. AX-31
StatusPublished

This text of 458 So. 2d 1193 (McCoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy v. State, 458 So. 2d 1193, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16565 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court departed from the sentencing guidelines for the following stated reason:

[T]he court has gone outside the sentencing guidelines because this man was previously placed on probation. That in itself the court considers to be aggravating circumstances sufficient not to be bound by sentencing guidelines.

We affirm the departure from the guidelines. Carter v. State, 452 So.2d 953 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Gordon v. State, 454 So.2d 657 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. State
454 So. 2d 657 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Carter v. State
452 So. 2d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
458 So. 2d 1193, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2377, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.