McCoy v. State

921 S.W.2d 605, 324 Ark. 452, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 289
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 20, 1996
DocketCR 96-514
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 921 S.W.2d 605 (McCoy v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
McCoy v. State, 921 S.W.2d 605, 324 Ark. 452, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 289 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Leroy King McCoy, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, R. Brent Crews, filed a timely notice of appeal. While appellant apparently retained another attorney, Mr. Crews failed to ask to be relieved as counsel. He admits that he was required to do so, see Young v. State, 318 Ark. 235, 884 S.W.2d 591 (1994), and that the failure to timely file the record was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James v. State
942 S.W.2d 250 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
921 S.W.2d 605, 324 Ark. 452, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-state-ark-1996.