McCoy v. Rosenblatt

304 F. App'x 175
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2008·No. No. 08-6440·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Frankie L. McCoy, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosenblatt, No. 1:05-cv-00480-WDQ (D.Md. Mar. 17, 2008). We deny McCoy’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Rosenblatt, 304 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2008).

304 F. App'x 175 (McCoy v. Rosenblatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related