McCoy v. Rosemont Auto Title Loans (In re McCoy)

219 F. App'x 326
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2007·No. No. 06-2141·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sheila Ollisa McCoy appeals the district court’s orders (1) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion to avoid the Appellee’ s interest in her vehicle, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(F) (2000), and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Rosemont Auto Title Loans, No. 2:06-cv-00344-JBF (E.D.Va. Oct. 5, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McCoy v. Rosemont Auto Title Loans (In re McCoy), 219 F. App'x 326 (4th Cir. 2007).

219 F. App'x 326 (McCoy v. Rosemont Auto Title Loans (In re McCoy)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exemptions
11 U.S.C. § 522(F)