McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
This text of 104 F. App'x 337 (McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Susan McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, awarding summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing McCoy’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and [338]*338find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-03-491-2-23BG (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 F. App'x 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccoy-v-merrill-lynch-pierce-fenner-smith-inc-ca4-2004.