McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

104 F. App'x 337

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2004·No. No. 04-1190·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Susan McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, awarding summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing McCoy’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and [338] find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-03-491-2-23BG (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Susan McCoy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, awarding summary judgment to Defendant, and dismissing McCoy’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and [338] find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, No. CA-03-491-2-23BG (D.S.C. Jan. 21, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 104 F. App'x 337 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 337 (McCoy v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.